PLAN TO END CORRUPTION
I believe the best hope for ending all corruption, including corruption in science, is Sociocracy, or something like it. You could call it quasi-unanimous rule. But it’s actually a decision-making method for groups that’s been pretty well developed rather scientifically, as I understand it.
I studied it quite a bit and I practiced it in an online chat room weekly for a few months about 18 years ago. I also had experience with Quaker meetings for business which also use quasi-unanimous rule. In fact, the originator of Sociocracy is said to have been inspired or taught by Quakers, I guess in the Netherlands.
I think it’s easy to tell there’s a lot of corruption in science, but I guess it’s not so obvious when you’re trained by mainstream education.
My idea is to make this a book, so I plan to write some papers and add the links below.
SOCIOCRATIC METHOD
Sociocracy divides people into circles of 6 to 8 people each and the circles are connected together with members who are part of other circles.
I reckon a way to start is to invite a few people to form a core group of 6 to 8 people. The members of the core group should be people who have time and interest to meet for one hour a week for a while. I’ll try to come up with an agenda for the first meeting, or the first several meetings. I’ll post a link to this on the Thunderbolts.info forum at https://www.thunderbolts.info/wp/forum3/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?t=1136. Anyone reading this is encouraged to volunteer to join the core group or to invite other potentially interested persons to join it.
The image I’m using for this post suggests that I’m opposed to climate science. I do find a lot wrong with it, but I don’t have a problem with proponents of it being involved in the Science Revolution, since Sociocratic method should be able to deal with diverse views.
PAPERS
CORRUPTION IN SCIENCE
SOCIOCRACY WILL END CORRUPTION
SCIENCE NONSENSE
(under pre-construction, i.e. like big bang, expanding universe, nebular hypothesis, black holes, worm holes, dark matter/energy, neutron stars, AGW, unsound dating methods, uniformitarianism, quantum mechanics, relativity, massless photons, entanglement, flat earth, way shortened history {Fomenko, Heinsohn}, no-virus theory, vaccine theory, mainstream medicine, UFO theory, no moon landings theory & no nuclear bombs theory {Miles Mathis}, Spacetime, String theory, Gravity waves, CMBR. …)
Someone points out another nonsense practice is ignoring anomalous data that undermines a mainstream theory just because there is no comprehensive alternative, giving the example of Halton Arp’s evidence of high redshift quasars connected to low redshift galaxies. Also, there’s the of attacking a theory, such as Velikovsky's book, Worlds in Collision, without reading it. And thirdly is completely avoiding questioning basic assumptions like that gravity is the main force in the universe.
SCIENCE IMPEDIMENTS
(under pre-construction, i.e. like biased funding, financial incentive, political agendas, biased peer review, biased education, cultural conditioning …)
PROGRESSIVE SCIENTIFIC METHOD
(under pre-construction)
SCIENCE GOALS
(under pre-construction)
SCIENCE ENCYCLOPEDIA SUPPLEMENT
(way under pre-construction) The purpose of this Supplement is to show problems and corrections to important mainstream science errors, including those listed in the Science Nonsense paper.
SELF-DIRECTED EDUCATION